In a line of works titled “Tobacco Project” Xu Bing symbolized humanity’s relationship with tobacco across art works including a book of tobacco slogans printed on tobacco leaves. This specific installation is a mock- tiger rug made of over half a million ‘1st Class’ brand cigarettes, carpet, and adhesive, and Xu Bing named it accordingly “1st Class”. 40 feet long and 15 feet wide, “1st Class’ is a larger than life tiger skin symbolizing “human prowess: it confirms our superiority by transforming one of nature’s fiercest predators into a lifeless skin beneath our feet.” (Ravenal, 2011) The oversized quality of the skin is no coincidence, as Xu Bing aims to invoke a slightly remorseful self-reflection. The size also doubles as a way to make one artwork into two: a massive collection of cigarettes and separately an oversized tiger rug, and the oversized tiger could additionally signify an especially dangerous or threatening animal. As a tiger rug is associated with “luxury, status, and domination” Xu Bing forces the viewer to think about the correlation between these traits and humanity’s relationship with smoking cigarettes. Ravenal writes “The beauty of the tiger-skin pattern, its allusions to the dangerous thrill of the hunt, and the uncanny allure of the massive display of cigarettes ironically glamorize the addictive pull and risks of smoking.” (Ravenal, 2011) The monochromaticity of the tiger is clearly not made to look realistic, but it is rather an artistic decision to switch the oranges and blacks of normal tiger skin to white and orange (with orange stripes over a white background, keeping the color scheme as that of the cigarettes). However, from other viewpoints some of the tiger skin looks like a darker brown color, and this is because from standing on the other side you can see down the end of the cigarette, creating a darker sort of stippled look. This may emulate two different views of or opinions on cigarettes; those who enjoy them for the taste and/or feeling, and those who are suffering from addiction or physical health problems manifested from smoking.
Page 4 of 9
My first artwork is Chairman Mao Visits a Homemade Blast Furnace designed by Zhou Xuefen and Yin Quanyuan. It was created in November of 1958 and depicts Mao Zedong the then Chairman of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) watching some people use a homemade furnace. This piece was created for the Communist Party during the first year of the Great Leap Forward, a plan to increase industry and agriculture to hopefully compete with Great Britain. Homemade blast furnaces were utilized during the Great Leap Forward to smelt metal in peoples homes for steel. In this image Mao is seen as an everyman who like everyone else is helping to smelt objects down for steel. This can be personified by the slacks and being close to the workers. This image is also shows hard work from by the sweat rags around two peoples neck and the smoke coming from the furnace. These ideas of heat and sweat are a symbol of hard work. This work also goes to show Mao as a cult of personality with the crowd of people behind him staring and are seemingly amazed by his hard work. One of the reasons for the Great Leap Forward is the idea of keeping up with the western powers so one of the details in the image is the graph that show significant increases. This goes to show how successful the Great Leap Forward is even if the graph growth is not happening in the real world this piece of propaganda will make it seem like smelting is good for the economy and therefore China. We know now that the homemade smelting of personal items never really increased the progress of China. The cartoonist imagery makes it easy to digest for an average person and will get them to support the CCP just like Mao is doing. While this image may depict a thing Mao actually did it may exaggerate how much he did.
Works Citied
Quanyuan Yin, & Xuefen Zhou (1958). Chairman Mao Visits a Homemade Blast Furnace. Chineseposters.net. Retrieved April 24, 2023, from https://chineseposters.net/posters/pc-1958-007
J., Andrews (2012). The art of modern China. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb32156.0001.001.
M., Chiu, & S. T., Zheng (2009). Art and China’s revolution. Asia Society.
“Urban Landscape – San Francisco” is a visually stunning installation. It was installed by Zhan Wang (China, b. 1962) and is constructed using a large amount of stainless steel household cooking objects. Pans with spoons and serving utensils outline the city. The inner city features tall towers of pots and pans of different shapes and sizes which perfectly emulate skyscrapers. Knives and other similar objects highlight the lanes of the city roads. The background is illuminated in part by Wang’s famous stainless steel rock sculptures.
The piece is critical in nature. The intention of the piece is to show the potential of change in beautiful cities. He is able to travel the world and create beautiful cities that are disassembled after some time. Growing up in China, Wang explains that the places he loved in his city were constantly demolished along with all the memories from those places.
“As someone who has lived all his life in Beijing, I have seen this regime demolishing non-stop. They don’t let you choose a place and make it special and meaningful; sooner or later, they will take it down. By trying to reach a level of western-oriented modernization, we are destroying the continuity of our own tradition.” – Zhan Wang
Bibliography:
Art Basel. “Urban Landscape – San Francisco, 2008”. 2015. https://www.cafa.com.cn/en/News/details/8330204.
This piece by Yue Minjun has clear inspiration from the Tiananmen Square Massacre of 1989 where the military opened fire on protesters, killing hundreds. As with the majority of Minjun’s works, everyone is depicted with a massive grin. I see this a representing how the people under the CCP had to always appear happy with the state of their country even this wasn’t true because if you expressed your dissatisfaction you would be killed. As stated in an interview in 2015, Yue Minjun says “In my work, laughter is a representation of a state of helplessness, lack of strength and participation, with the absence of our rights that society has imposed on us. In short, life. It makes you feel obsolete, which is why, sometimes, you only have laughter as a revolutionary weapon to fight against cultural and human indifference”. Knowing this, it can be interpreted that with nothing the victims of the Tiananmen square massacre could do nothing but smile. I also find it interesting that the people who are supposed to be the shooters are also smiling, possibly showing that the military had to shoot because if they did not prove their loyalty to the CCP, they could just as well share the same fate. To Minjun, Laughter is almost like a form of mockery of the CCP for how ridiculous their actions are and to show that despite being powerless, the victims can still demine their killers with one final act.
This is Mask Series No.26, an oil on canvas created in 1995 by Zeng Fanzhi. We are shown two happy figures, a man and his dog. The observer is situated behind the man in the work, almost as if we are looking over his shoulder and getting a glimpse into his life. This man is looking into a mirror that shows a realistic reflection of himself and a dog, however the dog is not next to him in real life. His reflection is on a beach elsewhere. The most significant aspect of the painting is the mask on his face in the mirror.
The man is dressed in a bright yellow suit, with finely combed hair. He has a white mask covering his mouth, eyes, and nose. His eyes are wide, with wide red lips. An interesting thing to note is that the mask fits so well on his face that if the mask and his skin were the same color it would be very difficult to tell the apart. This suggests that he has been wearing it for so long or that it has become a part of him.
What does the mask symbolize, though? In the 1990’s, China was undergoing social and economic changes that were sparked by public unrest and globalization. The Tiananmen protest in 1989 implored for greater freedom, and globalization policies led to increased business with other countries [1]. What developed was a greater divide between the population as some benefitted more than others and led privileged lives. Essentially, a greater sense of individualism was taking root even though Chinese society placed an emphasis on collectivism. In fact, the economic reforms introduced profit incentives that increased the share of private and joint ventures by 8 percent [2]. People were focused on their own success, but were pressured into wearing a “mask” and saying its for the country’s benefit. This tension is what Zeng Fanzhi is highlighting.
Knowing this, the themes of wealth and the eagerness to show it are clearly displayed by the nice suit the man is wearing the beach he is on. This man is a component of the urban elite and his phony intentions are painted through satire; I mean look at that goofy mask! Interestingly, the mirror adds another implicit dynamic symbolizing the superficiality of the situation. Everyone is masquerading their patriotism but when they look in the mirror, you can see the truth. In the dog’s case, his truth doesn’t need a mask because he isn’t subjected to the pressures a human is.
Work Cited
1.Linda Chao & Ramon H. Myers (1998) China’s consumer revolution: The 1990s and beyond, Journal of Contemporary China, 7:18, 351-368, DOI: 10.1080/10670569808724319
2.Hu, Zuliu, and Mohsin S Khan. “Economic Issues 8 — Why Is China Growing so Fast?” International Monetary Fund, June 1997, https://www.imf.org/external/
Image:
上海香格纳文化艺术品有限公司 . “Mask Series 1995 No.26.” ShanghArt, https://www.shanghartgallery.com/galleryarchive/work.htm?workId=1309. Accessed 20 Apr. 2023.
The Last Banquet by Zhang Hongtu is a perfect example of what Zhang aims to do with his art by placing Mao Zedong into ironic and almost laughable situations. This painting depicts Mao Zedong as every character in a copy of the painting The Last Supper by Leonardo Da Vinci. In the Da Vinci original, Jesus sits with his disciples at a long banquet table. Jesus has his arms out and open towards the viewer. He faces directly outwards while his disciples gather in two groups around him and talk and look at each other. Behind the table are three windows that show the world outside, Jesus is centered in the middle window.
In Zhang Hongtu’s copy, he masterfully changes specific aspects of the painting to make a completely new narrative and also morph the European image into a Chinese one. Firstly, Mao plays the part of both Jesus and his disciples. All of the Maos wear the same shirt but in different colors, a classic workman’s shirt with a red collar. And like Jesus in the Da Vinci, the center Mao sits with his hands outstretched and looking directly towards the audience. He also sits in the center window of three paneled windows, but instead of a view of a blue sky, we see traditional Chinese paintings. On the table, they eat bowls of rice with chopsticks, instead of bread and wine.
In an interview with Zhang Hongtu at Michigan University, Zhang said he first saw The Last Supper when he was 14 years old, and he liked the storyline. He remembers the story as Jesus saying: “one of you will betray me.” So, in this painting, Zhang says that Mao asks “who will betray me?” Zhang continues to describe the irony of the painting as the fact that Mao Zedong never criticized himself but always criticizes other people. (A Conversation)
I personally love this painting because it really shows Zhang Hongtu’s sense of humor and his attention to detail. He has fun with his art while also criticizing important social and political topics. My favorite part of his paintings are the traditional Chinese paintings in the windows.
Bibliography:
(1) Zhang Hongtu, In Between East and West Zhang Hongtu in Conversation with Martin Powers
The Monument to the People’s Heroes and Hua Tianyou’s bas-relief
The May 4th Movement of 1919 is a bas-relief by Hua Tianyou, carved into the The Monument to the People’s Heroes, located in the Tiananmen Square. The monument is made mostly out of granite and marble, and is 124.5ft tall, which overshadows the Forbidden City when seen from the front. This monument consists of three parts, the words “Eternal Glory to the People’s Heroes” written in Mao Zedong’s characters in the front, an epitaph in the back drafted by Mao and written in Zhou Enlai’s beautiful calligraphy engraved in gold to commemorate the fallen martyrs of the revolution, and beneath it, eight huge bas-reliefs portraying eight major revolutionary episodes in chronological order. Premier Zhou Enlai took a personal interest in this project, and with his group of architects, sculptors, and historians, made this piece into a perfection. From a political standpoint, this monument is much more than a communist monument, but rather an indication of a turning point, remembering the past and moving on to a bright future that Mao has built .Later on, served as the center for large-scale mournings, such as the deaths of Zhou Enlai and Hu Yaobang, which eventually sparked the anti-communist Tiananmen Square protests, thus becoming the center of the anti-communist movements.
The bas-relief that Hua Tianyou worked on depicts the events of the May 4th movement, which was an anti-imperialist movement that students of the University of Beijing started.This eventually resulted in the abdication of the emperor, and thus the fall of the Qing dynasty. Hua’s bas-relief carving consists of 25 students in midst of the protest, with one of them wearing a gown and standing on a low stool, possibly preaching the wrongdoings of what the Qing government did in the Treaty of Versaille. Encircling him are several students calling for support and distributing leaflets and curious students avidly listening to the preacher. Female figures in this bas-relief plays a huge role in which it emphasizes the fact that women also took part in this movement, depicting that they are as enthusiastic with their male counterparts and also breaking away from their traditional roles. The entrance to the Forbidden City in the background, to make the bas-relief more lively, shows the viewers that the event took place where the viewer is standing, allowing them to feel history at first hand.
Bibliography
Hung, C.-tai. (2017). Chapter 10: The Monument to the People’s Heroes. In Mao’s New World Political Culture in the early people’s republic. essay, Cornell University Press.
Monument to the peoples heroes. Architectuul. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2023, from https://architectuul.com/architecture/monument-to-the-peoples-heroes
Juin Octobre, 1985 was painted by Zou Wou-Ki in 1985, but it is not clear if the artist had started painting this masterpiece in June, and ended in October. The painting itself does not depict a certain object, group of people, or even a landscape like traditional Chinese paintings do. As a matter of fact, it shows nothing but bodies of colors. To be specific, it only shows a blurb of bright yellow in the center, with bluish darkness and some green filling up the edges and the corners – leading to the conclusion that this is an abstract painting. The colors in this painting are not separated by a definitive border, but there is a sense of depth and sophistication, where the yellow part of the painting is hollow. The colors merge together where they connect, as if blue, black, and green drops of paint have been dropped in a body of bright yellow colored water. This single painting on a single canvas followed Zou Wou Ki’s signature style in painting – oil on canvas.
[Image of Juin Octobre, 1985. Obtained from https://www.sothebys.com/en/articles/the-largest-ever-work-by-zao-wou-ki-leads-sothebys-hong-kong-autumn-sales]
Expert opinions lead to the conclusion that Zou was greatly affected by the ideology of Zen Buddhism and Daoism (also known as Taoism) (Shnin, Yang 2021, 129). Zen Buddhism emphasizes present-moment awareness and non-conceptual understanding (Suzuki 1991, 34), and Daoism beliefs generally assume nature is what controls things, not people (Kohn 2009, 20). Zao has also lectured his students to “forget the topic and forget about everything in the world (Shnin, Yang 2021, 129)” and emphasized the importance of “nothingness”, which led to an art-work like Juin Octobre, 1985. The painting is quite massive, measuring about 10 meters in length and 2.8m in height, and from my understanding of the beliefs that Zou had in mind when he was painting, I came to the conclusion that this majestic size of the painting probably represented the vastness of “nothingness”. The fact that nothing, except colors, were shown in the painting without any figures or symbols in such a large painting is what made me think this way. The feeling of depth (yellow part) created by Zao also creates a sense of hollowness, which to me allowed me to focus on the presence of me looking at the painting, as if the void was supposed to be filled with my (the viewer) awareness.
References
Kohn, Livia. Introducing daoism. JBE Online Books, 2009.
Shin, Ryan, and Xuhao Yang. “Culturally Responsible Approach to Teaching East Asian Art in the Classroom.” Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education 38, no. 1 (2021).
Suzuki, Daisetz Teitaro. An introduction to zen buddhism. Grove Press, 1991.
Sky Ladder is a performance art piece by Chinese contemporary artist Cai Guo-Qiang, known for his use of gunpowder in his art. The performance was first executed in 2012 in Sanxingdui, China, and then later in other locations such as Havana, Cuba, and Los Angeles, California.
The performance consists of a ladder which is made of metal rods and is attached to a balloon filled with helium which rises as the ladder is lit on fire. The result of this masterpiece of a display is a beautiful and ephemeral display of fireworks in the sky. This created a visual representation of a ladder, which was completely on fire, on its way to the heavens.
Cai Guo-Qiang’s use of gunpowder in his art is rooted in Chinese culture and history. Gunpowder was actually invented in China and has been used for centuries for both military and artistic purposes. Cai uses gunpowder to create large-scale installations and performances that explore themes of cultural identity, globalization, and the relationship between nature and humanity.
Sky Ladder is a particularly poignant example of Cai’s use of gunpowder, as it represents a universal human desire for transcendence and connection to the divine. The ladder is a symbol of progress and ascent, and was made even more powerful by its temporary and fragile nature. As the ladder burns away and disappears into the sky, viewers are reminded of the impermanence of life and the need to embrace the fleeting moments of beauty and connection.
Sky Ladder is a stunning and thought-provoking work of art that highlights Cai Guo-Qiang’s unique artistic vision and his ability to merge traditional Chinese cultural elements with contemporary artistic practices. By creating a literal ladder to the heavens, Cai invites viewers to consider their own relationship to the divine and to the larger universe around them.
Picture/info
Jaworowski, Ken. “Review: Fireworks in “Sky Ladder: The Art of Cai Guo-Qiang.”” The New York Times, 13 Oct. 2016, www.nytimes.com/2016/10/14/movies/sky-ladder-the-art-of-cai-guo-qiang-review.html. Accessed 21 Apr. 2023.
More info/great film
Macdonald, Kevin . “Watch Sky Ladder: The Art of Cai Guo-Qiang | Netflix Official Site.” Www.netflix.com, 14 Oct. 2014, www.netflix.com/watch/80097472?trackId=14277281&tctx=-97%2C-97%2C%2C%2C%2C%2C%2C%2C80097472%2CVideo%3A80097472%2C. Accessed 21 Apr. 2023.
Ai Weiwei “Sunflower Seeds”
Porcelain, ink
2010
“Sunflower Seeds” by Ai Weiwei consists of 100 million handmade, individually painted porcelain sunflower seeds. When piled up, these handcrafted sunflower seeds look like a mound of unrecognizable shapes. Once examined up close, the sunflower seeds can be recognized. This installation was first displayed at the Turbine Hall at the Tate Modern in London.
The idea for this artwork came from what Ai Weiwei witnessed as a child in China during Mao’s rule. When Ai’s community would gather together following Mao’s order, everyone would eat sunflower seeds because they were so nervous. Ai Weiwei’s father was a counter-revolutionary and would be called on stage at these meetings and have to endure insults. The sunflower seeds were eaten in order to calm him down and gave everyone an outlet to soothe their nerves.
The production of the sunflower seeds took place in a city famous for its porcelain, Jingdezhen. The pieces of stone are first broken down with iron hammers and then pulverized into a powder. The powder is mixed with water until it is fully skimmed, leaving a thick paste behind. Before the mixture becomes too hard, it is divided into small bricks and then sent to porcelain factories in order to refine the powder even more. The porcelain is mixed with clay and then hand-pressed into sunflower-shaped molds. The seeds are then painted with black ink. Ai Weiwei makes a comment about the importance of having many different painters: “Each one is different, you show it through your own control of the brush and your breath and your own body gestures. You pick a seed up and you put on ink, more ink or less ink, lightly or thickly painted. Then you turn it over and place it down. It’s such a beautiful act” (Ai 2014:104). The differences between each sunflower seed is what Ai embraced.
This installation involved thousands of individuals who worked together in order to produce something bigger. The importance of this piece is that the little seeds create a form bigger than itself. Ai Weiwei wanted the viewers to question everything about this piece. He wanted people to wonder and look closer to figure out the meaning and process behind this work.
Works Cited
Weiwei, Ai, and Anthony Pins. Spatial Matters: Art Architecture and Activism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press , 2014.
Image
https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/unilever-series/unilever-series-ai-weiwei-sunflower-seeds